由 jpichiban 
澳大利亚联邦法院裁定，一个仅限女性使用的社交媒体平台因拒绝一名跨性别女性的加入申请而构成歧视。该平台以性别为由拒绝了这名女性的申请，但法官认为性别是一个“可变且不一定是二元的”概念。该裁决被认为是跨性别权利的里程碑式胜利，可能会对其他国家关于性别认同和基于性别权利的法律先例产生影响。
Original Title: 什么是女性？澳大利亚法院发布里程碑式案件裁决
Summary: An Australian transgender woman won a discrimination lawsuit against a social media app for women only, which had denied her access based on her sex assigned at birth. The Australian Federal Court ruling found that while Roxanne Tickle was not directly discriminated against, she was a victim of indirect discrimination, and ordered the app to pay her 10,000 Australian dollars ($6,700 / £5,100) in damages and costs. This ruling is considered a landmark case in terms of gender identity. The case centered on a question increasingly debated: what does it mean to be a woman? The case, known as Tickle v Giggle, is the first in Australia’s Federal Court to deal with discrimination based on gender identity. It has brought to the fore one of the sharpest ideological battles of our time, played out in the courtroom: inclusion for transgender people versus rights based on sex.
Original article: https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/world-69290699?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA